<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Henry Ford Health System - CRSLS</title>
	<atom:link href="https://crsls.sls.org/tag/henry-ford-health-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://crsls.sls.org</link>
	<description>MIS Case Reports of the Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic &#38; Robotic Surgeons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:34:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Intrauterine Device Transmigration Into Sigmoid Bowel in Early Pregnancy</title>
		<link>https://crsls.sls.org/2014-00164/</link>
					<comments>https://crsls.sls.org/2014-00164/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SLS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2014 04:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[OB/GYN Laparoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surgical Endoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1.1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Ford Health System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intrauterine device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laparoscopy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lauren Schiff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Perforation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pregnancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sigmoid colon]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://crsls.sls.org/?p=856</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Lauren Schiff, MD Women’s Health Services, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA ABSTRACT Introduction: Uterine perforation at the time of intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is estimated to occur at a rate of 1 per 1000 insertions. Most published cases describing transmigration into abdominal viscera are in the setting of [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://crsls.sls.org/2014-00164/">Intrauterine Device Transmigration Into Sigmoid Bowel in Early Pregnancy</a> first appeared on <a href="https://crsls.sls.org">CRSLS</a>.</p>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lauren Schiff, MD</p>
<p>Women’s Health Services, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA</p>
<p><strong>ABSTRACT</strong></p>
<div data-canvas-width="359.1385294117647" data-angle="0" data-font-name="g_font_3"><em>Introduction:</em> Uterine perforation at the time of intrauterine device (IUD) insertion is estimated to occur at a rate of 1 per 1000 insertions. Most published cases describing transmigration into abdominal viscera are in the setting of uterine perforation. In the case described here, IUD transmigration into the bowel lumen is chronologically documented in early pregnancy and apparently unrelated to uterine perforation.</p>
<div data-canvas-width="272.3951633986929" data-angle="0" data-font-name="g_font_3"><em>Case Description:</em> A 36-year-old gravida 7, para 7 woman seeking permanent sterilization explained that she became pregnant with her last child with a copper IUD in place. The device was intrauterine on her first obstetric ultrasonogram at 6 weeks, 2 days of gestation. Subsequent ultrasonography 2 days later revealed no intrauterine IUD. The patient had a successful full-term delivery. Four months following delivery, the IUD was found on an abdominal X-ray at the level of the sacrum. On laparoscopic evaluation, the IUD was found embedded in the lumen of the sigmoid colon with only the strings visibly protruding through the serosa.</p>
<div data-canvas-width="241.08385620915033" data-angle="0" data-font-name="g_font_3"><em>Discussion:</em> The rates of bowel injury related to IUD insertion and delayed translocation are unknown. The mechanism of translocation is not fully understood. A possible mechanism may be partial- to full-thickness myometrial penetration at the time of insertion allowing fistualization between the uterus and a hollow viscus via inflammatory processes. The documented early pregnancy translocation of an IUD suggests that intrauterine pregnancy may be the impetus for this process and reinforces the recommendation to remove an intrauterine IUD in pregnancy at the time of diagnosis.</p>
<div data-canvas-width="443.4564705882354" data-angle="0" data-font-name="g_font_3"><em>Key Words:</em> Intrauterine device, Laparoscopy, Perforation, Pregnancy, Sigmoid colon.<iframe src="//docs.google.com/viewer?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcrsls.sls.org%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2014%2F11%2F13-00164.pdf&hl=en_US&embedded=true" class="gde-frame" style="width:100%; height:500px; border: none;" scrolling="no"></iframe>
<p class="gde-text"><a href="https://crsls.sls.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/13-00164.pdf" class="gde-link">Download (PDF, 162KB)</a></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div><p>The post <a href="https://crsls.sls.org/2014-00164/">Intrauterine Device Transmigration Into Sigmoid Bowel in Early Pregnancy</a> first appeared on <a href="https://crsls.sls.org">CRSLS</a>.</p>]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://crsls.sls.org/2014-00164/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
